Experimental architecture differs from conventional architecture in several ways:
1. Approach: Experimental architecture is more of an explorative and research-oriented approach. It tends to focus on testing the boundaries of design and pushing new concepts in unique and unusual ways. Conventional architecture, on the other hand, is more practical and deals with traditional design principles and functionality.
2. Methodology: Experimental architecture employs new materials and techniques with other disciplines like art, engineering, and technology. In contrast, conventional architecture utilizes materials and techniques that are tried and tested.
3. Functionality and Usage: Experimental architecture is often conceptual and may not be designed for practical use, whereas the conventional architecture is more practical and aims to create functional spaces for the user.
4. Cost: Experimental architecture is often more expensive than conventional architecture because it requires testing and experimentation with new materials and methods, which can be time-consuming and costly.
5. Aesthetics: Experimental architecture often has a unique and unconventional aesthetic, while conventional architecture relies on traditional design principles and aesthetics.
Publication date: