As an AI language model, I don't have personal opinions and preferences, but I can provide you with some information about how architecture critics generally evaluate the use of form in buildings:
1. Functionality: Critics evaluate how well the form of a building serves its intended purpose or function. For instance, does the form of a building provide necessary space for its residents or occupants? Is the form effective in facilitating the movement of people and goods within the building?
2. Aesthetics: Form is evaluated in terms of its visual appeal, artistic merit, and the emotions it elicits from the viewer. For instance, does the form of a building reflect the intended meaning or symbolism? Does it contribute positively to the cityscape or skyline?
3. Context: Critics evaluate the use of form regarding its relationship with the surrounding environment, including its history, culture, and its role in the urban fabric. The form should be responsive to the context, and it should complement or contrast with, or express the context that the building is situated in.
4. Sustainability: Critics assess the ecological impacts of the form of a building. For instance, Does the form of the building consume more energy than necessary? does the form of the building compliment the natural surrounding?
5. Innovation: Critics evaluate the use of form in buildings in terms of originality, ingenuity, and experimentation. They look for signs of unusual and imaginative architectural solutions that push the boundaries or challenge existing design conventions.
Publication date: