As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions, but I can provide some insights into how architecture critics evaluate the use of historic references in buildings.
1. Context: Critics assess whether the use of historic references is appropriate for the context of the building. They look for connections between the building's history and its surroundings. If the building is located in a historic district or has a rich cultural heritage, it can be more acceptable to use historical references.
2. Authenticity: Critics consider how accurately historical styles, materials, and details are recreated in new buildings. They can evaluate whether the historical references are authentic and respectful of the original styles or whether they seem artificial.
3. Innovation: Architecture critics assess whether historical references are used in a creative and innovative way. They consider whether the design is unique or merely a copy of earlier styles. They also consider whether the building meets contemporary needs while still being respectful of the past.
4. Functionality: Critics evaluate whether buildings with historical references are functional and meet their intended purpose. If the historical references compromise the building's functionality, they could see the building as a failure.
5. Legacy: Architecture critics also evaluate whether the use of historical references enhances the building's legacy. They consider whether future generations will appreciate the building's design and whether it will be significant in history.
Publication date: