1. Communication Barrier: There may be communication barriers between architects and risk managers due to differences in language, perspective, and context. Architects may use complex technical terms while risk managers may use simple language, which can create misunderstandings and misinterpretation of information.
2. Lack of Shared Understanding: There may be differences in perception and understanding of architecture between architects and risk managers, leading to different interpretations of risks and their impacts on architecture.
3. Complexity of Architecture: Complex or poorly designed architectures can increase the risk of vulnerabilities, making it difficult to assess their overall risk posture. Consequently, it will be difficult to align architecture clarity with risk management.
4. Lack of Process: There may be a lack of standardized processes and methodologies for architecture clarity and risk management, leading to inconsistencies in risk identification, assessment, and mitigation. This includes confusion in terms of roles and responsibilities, lack of coordination, etc.
5. Time Constraints: There may be time constraints in identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks. In such circumstances, clarity in the architecture may be compromised in favor of faster solutions, which escalates the risk posture unsustainably.
6. Limited Resources: Limited resources can limit the analysis and management of risks in architecture, leading to unclear risk assessments, and ultimately inadequate alignment between architecture clarity and risk management.
Publication date: