Modernist architecture emerged in the early 20th century as a response to the industrial revolution and the changing social and political landscape. It was often associated with progressive political movements, and modernist architects sought to create buildings that reflected the values and aspirations of these movements.
For example, modernist architecture was often associated with the socialist and communist movements of the time, as well as with the progressive welfare state policies advocated by many liberal and social democratic parties. Architects such as Le Corbusier and Walter Gropius, who were leaders of the modernist movement, saw their work as part of a broader effort to create a more just and equitable society.
However, modernist architecture also had a complicated relationship with politics. Some architects, such as Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, believed that architecture should remain neutral and apolitical. Others, such as the Italian architect Antonio Sant'Elia, were explicitly political and saw their work as a tool for advancing political and social change.
At the same time, modernist architecture was often criticized by conservatives and traditionalists who saw it as a threat to established social and political norms. This opposition was particularly strong in countries such as Germany and Italy, where fascist regimes saw modernist architecture as a symbol of decadent Western culture.
Overall, the relationship between modernist architecture and politics was complex and multifaceted. While modernist architects saw their work as part of broader progressive movements, they also faced opposition from conservative forces who opposed their vision of a more modern and egalitarian society.
Publication date: