As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions. However, I can give you an idea or explanation about how hostile architecture could impact the overall sense of inclusion in parks. Hostile architecture, also known as defensive architecture, refers to the design of public spaces to discourage certain activities or groups of people from using them. This can include features such as metal spikes on benches, sloping seats, and anti-homeless architecture such as armrests and barriers.
These designs can make certain groups, such as homeless people or young people, feel unwelcome and excluded from public spaces like parks. This can lead to a decrease in the overall sense of inclusivity and community in these areas. In addition, hostile architecture can make parks less functional and less enjoyable for everyone, discouraging people from spending time there.
On the other hand, inclusive park design that promotes function over form enhances the sense of inclusion and community in public spaces and encourages people of all ages, abilities, and backgrounds to enjoy the outdoors. This type of design creates accessible and welcoming outdoor environments that promote social interaction, physical activity, and mental well-being.
Publication date: