Is there any flexibility in the design of De Stijl buildings or is it strictly adhered to a set pattern?

De Stijl, also known as Neo-plasticism, was an artistic movement that emerged in the early 20th century and encompassed various forms of art, including architecture. Like other forms of art within the movement, De Stijl architecture aimed to achieve a visual harmony through the use of geometric shapes, primary colors, and a non-representational style.

While De Stijl architecture followed certain principles, there was still flexibility in its design. The movement promoted a reductionist approach, focusing on simplicity and abstraction, but within these parameters, architects had some autonomy in their designs. Different architects interpreted the principles of De Stijl in their own ways, resulting in variations in the appearance and functionality of the buildings.

For instance, Gerrit Rietveld, an important architect associated with De Stijl, created notable buildings like the Schröder House in Utrecht, Netherlands. While adhering to the movement's principles of using primary colors and geometric forms, Rietveld's buildings displayed a level of flexibility in their spatial arrangements and functional aspects. The Schröder House, designed as a residence, had movable walls and furniture that allowed the occupants to modify the interior spaces according to their needs.

In summary, while De Stijl architecture has certain principles that highlight the use of geometric shapes and primary colors, there was still flexibility in its design. Architects could interpret and apply the movement's principles in their own way, resulting in variations in the appearance and functionality of the buildings.

Publication date: