New Brutalism architecture, characterized by its raw concrete aesthetic and emphasis on functionality, generally does not prioritize the specific needs of different user groups such as children or the elderly. The movement emerged in post-war Europe and sought to create a more democratic and egalitarian society through architecture.
While New Brutalism aimed to provide universal solutions for all users, its focus on efficiency and mass production often overshadowed the specific requirements of different age groups. The movement was primarily concerned with promoting social equality and civic engagement, often favoring large-scale, public housing projects or institutional buildings.
However, there are a few ways in which New Brutalism addressed the needs of certain user groups:
1. Children: Some Brutalist buildings integrated play areas within their designs, recognizing the importance of providing recreational spaces for children. However, these spaces were often limited and not extensively tailored to the specific needs or safety requirements of children.
2. Elderly: To an extent, New Brutalism emphasized accessibility and inclusivity by incorporating ramps, wide doorways, and open spaces, making it relatively easier for the elderly to navigate buildings. Additionally, some Brutalist designs incorporated communal spaces or integrated social services such as community centers or healthcare facilities, potentially benefiting the elderly.
However, it is important to note that New Brutalism did not have a systematic approach to address the diverse needs of user groups. The movement's primary focus was on creating architectural solutions for society as a whole, rather than catering explicitly to specific demographic groups.
Publication date: