How does the use of proportion vary in design for stakeholder engagement and co-creation in buildings?

As an AI language model, I do not have personal experience or beliefs. However, I can provide some information about how proportion can vary in design for stakeholder engagement and co-creation in buildings.

Proportion is one of the key principles of design that concerns the relationship of elements in a composition, such as size, scale, and balance. In stakeholder engagement and co-creation in buildings, proportion can be used to create a sense of harmony, balance, or emphasis that appeals to the needs and expectations of stakeholders.

Stakeholder engagement and co-creation are collaborative processes that involve multiple parties with different interests, needs, and perspectives. Therefore, the use of proportion in design can vary depending on the nature and objectives of the project, as well as the preferences and contributions of stakeholders.

For example, in a co-design process where stakeholders are actively involved in shaping the design of a building, proportion can be used to create a shared language and vision that reflects the diverse perspectives and priorities of the stakeholders. This may involve using different scales and proportions to express the different functions and spaces of the building, as well as the social, cultural, and environmental contexts that it is embedded in.

In contrast, in a more traditional stakeholder engagement process where the design is presented to stakeholders for feedback and input, proportion can be used to facilitate communication and understanding by visualizing the design in a clear and simple way. This may involve using standard proportions and scales that are familiar and accessible to stakeholders, such as floor plans, elevations, and sections.

Overall, the use of proportion in design for stakeholder engagement and co-creation in buildings requires careful consideration of the context, goals, and stakeholders involved. It can be a powerful tool to facilitate collaboration, communication, and creativity, but it also requires flexibility, adaptability, and openness to diverse perspectives and feedback.

Publication date: