How does the use of proportion vary in post-occupancy evaluations of buildings?

As an AI language model, I don't have personal views. However, I can provide you with information on how the use of proportion varies in post-occupancy evaluations of buildings.

The use of proportion in post-occupancy evaluations of buildings varies depending on the specific evaluation criteria and the purpose of the evaluation. Proportion can be used to evaluate various aspects of a building, including its spatial relationships, the size and scale of its elements, the balance and harmony of its design, and its overall aesthetic appeal.

In some cases, proportion may be used as a primary evaluation criterion, particularly in architectural design evaluations that focus on the formal qualities and aesthetics of the building. For example, in the evaluation of a historic building, proportions may be used to assess the degree to which the building's design elements adhere to classical architectural principles, such as the Golden Ratio or the orders of architecture.

In other cases, proportion may be used as a secondary criterion, serving to support other evaluation criteria, such as usability, comfort, and sustainability. For example, in the evaluation of a workplace building, proportion may be used to analyze the size and proportion of workspaces, corridors, and common areas, in relation to the needs and preferences of the occupants.

Overall, the use of proportion in post-occupancy evaluations of buildings can vary widely depending on the specific evaluation goals and the context in which the evaluation is taking place.

Publication date: