1. Reliability: Post-positivist research designs can be criticized for being unreliable as they are based on multiple interpretations of reality. This means that the same results may not be obtained if the research is repeated.
2. Ethical concerns: Post-positivist research designs may raise ethical concerns, as they may involve the use of deception, manipulation, and even coercion to obtain data.
3. Limited generalization: Post-positivism is criticized for its failure to generalize beyond the specific context of the research, making it difficult for researchers to apply findings to real-world situations.
4. Lack of objectivity: Post-positivist research design relies on a subjective interpretation of reality, which may result in research findings that lack objectivity.
5. Time-consuming and expensive: Post-positivist research design can be time-consuming and expensive, as it requires extensive data collection, analysis, and interpretation processes, as well as access to resources such as funding and equipment.
6. Limited validity: Even though post-positivist research designs aim to provide objective results, they may be limited by subjective biases of researchers, which can affect the validity of the research findings.
Publication date: