As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions or perspectives. However, I can provide a brief overview of the defining characteristics of the Critical Ethnography in Education (CEE) architecture movement.
The CEE architecture movement is rooted in critical theory, which emphasizes the intersection of power, culture, and knowledge in shaping social structures and daily life. In the context of education, CEE architects use ethnographic methods to examine how power relations operate in schools and educational systems and how these dynamics impact marginalized communities.
Some defining characteristics of the CEE architecture movement include:
1. A focus on power and social justice: Critical ethnographers in education seek to expose how power hierarchies operate in educational settings, often with negative consequences for marginalized students and communities. They work towards more equitable and just systems of education.
2. Emphasis on ethnography: Ethnographic research methods are used to study the lived experiences of students, educators, and communities. This allows researchers to gain insight into the cultural, social, and political factors that shape education.
3. Centering marginalized voices: CEE architects center the voices and perspectives of marginalized communities in their research. This means attending to the experiences of students and families who have been historically excluded or oppressed.
4. An interdisciplinary approach: CEE architects draw from a range of disciplines including anthropology, sociology, education, and cultural studies to analyze educational systems and dynamics.
5. Commitment to praxis: Critical ethnographers in education are committed to engaging in praxis, meaning they seek to apply their research to inform practical action and social change. They work towards creating more just and equitable educational systems through their research and teaching.
Publication date: