As an AI language model, I do not hold any personal opinions, biases or beliefs. However, Critical Social Theory in Education architecture movement is characterized by the following defining features:
1. Focus on social justice: This movement emphasizes that architecture, as in all aspects of society, should be aimed at promoting social justice. It argues that architects should use their skills and knowledge to create structures that are inclusive, equitable, and accessible to all, including marginalized and disadvantaged populations.
2. Critique of dominant power structures: Critical social theory in education architecture opposes the current dominant power structures in the architectural field that privileges the interests of the wealthy, powerful, and dominant social groups. Proponents of this movement argue for a more inclusive, equitable, and democratic architectural practice.
3. Intersectionality: The movement is committed to an intersectional approach to design, recognizing that different forms of oppression are interconnected and cannot be addressed independently. It advocates for an approach to design that is sensitive to issues such as race, gender, sexuality, class, and disability.
4. Advocacy for participation and democracy: The critical social theory in education architecture movement calls for increased participation and democracy in the design and construction of architecture. It values community involvement in the design process and aims to create spaces that are responsive to the needs and aspirations of the communities they serve.
5. Sustainability: The movement advocates for sustainable design practices that prioritize environmental sustainability, resource conservation, and the use of renewable energy sources. It recognizes that the built environment has a significant impact on the natural environment and seeks to mitigate this impact through sustainable design practices.
Publication date: